Owen Shroyer on his May 1st War Room show reported on
H.R.6090 – Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023
Owen made it sound pretty scary, I’ll try to sum up how I heard it.
Mainly he expressed concern that the following text could be weaponized against Christians.
For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”—
(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
(2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition.
Why?
Well, SEC. 4. item 2 can be found on https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/ as follows
Surely no one would object to that, live and let live right?
Ok, I don’t know about you, but I’m reminded of grade school and the sticks and stones lesson, that aside I believe any Jew will tell you they do plan to rule the world in the future, so if they admit that, surely then its not a conspiracy worthy of House attention, correct?
Ok, Owen indicated those both are expressly meant to say Christians can not say Jews killed Christ, in his view its meant to be anti-christian, but Jews don’t accept Jesus, Christians do, therefore its Christians that need to claim Jesus died for them, i.e. that we sacrificed and killed Him, in that sense, its not an issue, we don’t need to say they did anything other than that their one single high priest, Caiaphas, administrated the sacrifice on our behalf.
SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. 3 (b) Constitutional Protections.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
To me it seems if you don’t believe something that’s a religious freedom, the same as believing something.
Do you think its a 1A freedom to deny the holocaust, is this whole thing meant to cause trouble for Christians?
There may well be a conspiracy, but is it Jewish?
What do you all think of this bill?
Good Grief !! It is meant to stir trouble for sure. Anytime things like this arise they cause trouble.
My case in point is the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Meant mostly to protect the African Americans. And has been used to protect people wanting to mutilate their bodies.
I had a long reply, had to edit a link that didn’t work, and then the entire reply disappeared, poof, gone…
obsolete I guess
This topic was covered by two different shows yesterday on Infowars and getting a lot of traction today as well, seems the consensus is someone wants our bibles, history repeats
https://oll.libertyfund.org/publications/reading-room/2023-10-05-urban-banning-and-censoring-bible
It usually does why because they believe we are the backbone of the Trump Nationalist / populist movement
Ohh boy, tie Trump into it and it get confusing
What I don’t get is according to this article Jews don’t support Trump
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/trump-jews-israel-democrat-religion-antisemitism-gorka.html
But his embassy move should have solidified their votes, no?
https://www.timesofisrael.com/4-years-after-trump-decision-jerusalem-panel-releases-plan-for-permanent-us-embassy/
Yes you would think it would lock them in the trouble us with those articles is how to determine it is true or propaganda
Yep, writers seem to have an agenda,I found that first one tough to follow
In reality it doesn’t matter what those propaganda pusher think and I wish people could see that . There are so many people so easily warped and convinced beyond logic and commonsense that something is right that they can’t figure anything out on their own.
The old adage you don’t have an opinion unless I give it to you.
Ex. Latest generation of Democrat city college students